the hell of 1984 :: essays research papers

The Hell of xix cardinal.). Did Orwell realise quite what he had do in Nineteen Eighty-Four? His post-publication glosses on its meaning reveal any blankness or bad faith even about its contemporary political implications. He insisted, for example, that his recent novel was NOT intended as an attack on Socialism or on the British Labour Party (of which I am a supporter).(1) He may well non hand over intended it but that is what it can reasonably be taken to be. Warburg axiom this immediately he had read the manuscript, and predicted that Nineteen Eighty-Four was worth a cool million votes to the Conservative Party(2) the literary editor of the Evening well-worn sarcastically prescribed it as "required reading" for Labour Party M.P.s,(3) and, in the US, the Washington branch of the John Birch Society adopted "1984" as the exist four digits of its telephone number.(4) Moreover, Churchill had make the inseparably interwoven relation between socialism and despo tism a plank in his 1945 election campaign(5) (and was not the protagonist of Nineteen Eighty-Four cal take Winston?). If, ten years earlier, an Orwell had written a futuristic partiality in which Big Brother had had Hitlers features rather than Stalins, would not the Left, whatever the writers announced political sympathies, have welcomed it as showing how capitalism, by its very nature, led to totalitarian fascism?With Nineteen Eighty-Four, it is particularly necessary to trust the tale and not the teller, but even this has its pitfalls. Interpretations of the novel already exist which blatantly ignore the intentions of the author by reinterpreting its manifest content without any obvious justification. just now all existing interpretations of Nineteen Eighty-Four are unsatisfactory in one regard or another. For many years Nineteen Eighty-Four served as a sort of an ideological super-weapon in the Cold War,(6) was utilize along with Animal Farm as propaganda in the Western in termeshed zones of Germany, which it was feared ... might be invaded by Soviet troops,(7) and was later also made use of by West Germany as warning . . . about what a incoming under Stalin might be like.(8) There is much in the novel, of course, which allowed it to be interpreted as an attack on Soviet Communism and its allegedly aggressive intentions. Nonetheless, such an interpretation does not quite fit Ingsoc has been establish in Oceania by internal revolution and not by legions invasion or external pressure. The model is Trotsky rather than Stalin.